Dissect

Dissect

A second brain that reads everything you save and answers qu

tendhqapp
@tendhqapp
Published on Oct 8, 2026
Visit site
1 PeerPush
🔥
Awarded
Trending Now
PeerPush

Details

Pricing
Freemium from $4
Platforms
Web

Discovery signals

How AI and people discover Dissect on PeerPush

AI-readyAI-readyWhether this product carries the structured data - use cases, audiences, platforms - that lets AI match it to the right questions.
Structured

Described for AI to match

Described for AI with use cases, audiences, platforms and pricing so assistants can match it to the right questions.
Discoverable nowDiscoverable nowWhether this product is queryable through the PeerPush API and MCP right now.
Live

Via the PeerPush API and MCP

Queryable through the PeerPush API, MCP and semantic search from day one.

About Dissect

Dissect is a personal library that reads what you put into it. Most save tools keep a title, a thumbnail and a link. That is the same information you already had when you saved the thing, so opening it later costs as much as reading it fresh, which is why nobody goes back to their saves. Dissect reads the item instead. The full text of an article, the transcript and key frames of a video, the contents of a PDF, a voice note you recorded on your phone. Once it has been read, two things work. Search runs on meaning, so you can look for a colour, an object, a person or a half remembered idea rather than the exact words in the title, and it still lands if you spell it wrong or ask in another language. And you can ask the library questions directly. "What did I save about cold outreach?" gets an answer in plain words with links to the specific saves it came from. It will not answer from anything outside your own library, so it cannot invent a fact you never saved. You can save from the web app, a browser extension, your phone's share sheet, or by forwarding a link to the WhatsApp bot. Free tier is 10 saves a month. Paid is ₹99 or $4 a month for 100 saves and 50 questions, or ₹249 or $8 for unlimited.

Screenshots

Screenshot 1 of Dissect
Screenshot 2 of Dissect
Screenshot 3 of Dissect

Reviews (1)

Average 5.0 out of 5

5.0

Based on 1 review

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
nckbrz

Asking questions across everything I have saved, rather than re-reading articles, is a genuinely better take on read-later apps.

Comments (2)

GeneralManager_Getatext

Linking answers back to saved sources is useful. For PDFs and videos, do citations point to page numbers or timestamps? And when two saved sources disagree, does the answer make that conflict visible?

nckbrz
@nckbrz

Indexing the actual content of saved links instead of just titles fixes why read-later piles die. Curious how it handles long PDFs.