ScholarNet AI
Rival university brain battles and AI study tools
Details
- Follow on
- @ScholarNetAI
- Categories
- AIEducation & LearningGaming & Game Dev
- Use Cases
- Skill BuildingKnowledge Base
- Pricing
- Free
- Platforms
- Web
About ScholarNet AI
ScholarNet AI provides a platform where you can challenge students from rival universities in real-time Brain Battles. You can participate in game modes like Battle Royale, Territory Control, and Speed Blitz to win points for your school's national ranking. The platform offers a competitive environment designed to integrate AI study tools with academic gaming, helping you represent your university in a national leaderboard.
Product Insights
ScholarNet AI is a free web-based education platform that combines AI tutoring with competitive university-themed gaming. Students can participate in multiplayer modes like Battle Royale and Speed Blitz to earn points for their school's national ranking.
- Completely free for all users.
- Features unique academic gaming modes including Territory Control and Speed Blitz.
- Integrated AI tutoring for concept explanation and automated study plan generation.
- National university leaderboard for competitive school-based ranking.
Ideal for: Students and gamers who want to improve their skills through competitive academic battles while representing their university on a national stage.
Screenshots
Product Updates (1)
ScholarNet — "Our Shorts generator hallucinated a feature we don't have
We auto-generate YouTube Shorts for our 4 products. One ran this week for ScholarNet (a study/tutoring tool) and the narration said: "I graded 10 essays in 60 seconds and caught 20 grammar errors." Problem: ScholarNet doesn't grade essays. It's an AI tutor — explains concepts, builds study plans, runs Brain Battles (live quiz competitions between universities). Grammar checking is what QuillBot does. The Short had already published. Caught it by extracting frames from the live YouTube video and reviewing them on a phone-shaped viewport. Slide 7s showed comparison cards literally listing "QuillBot · Grammarly · ProWritingAid" — Gamma had extrapolated from the narration's writing-tool seed material. Fix shipped same day: - New defense layer: `PRODUCT_CAPABILITY_DENYLIST` — a regex map of features each product DOES NOT have. Catches "graded N essays", "caught N grammar errors", "paraphrasing", "QuillBot/Grammarly comparison" in narration before the LLM can ship them. Three retry attempts with explicit "use only real capabilities" guidance, then a sanitizer swap. - Pruned 4 writing-tool-adjacent SEO tags ("literature review", "citation generator", "thesis writing") that were biasing the topic generator toward writing tools. This is a different defense from our existing marketing-fab regex (which catches `$X saved` and `N% conversion rate`). Marketing-fab patterns look for QUANTIFIED claims. Capability hallucinations are narrative claims — different shape, different gate. Smoke test at `_test-capability-gate.js`: 14 positive/negative cases across 4 products, 16 capability labels asserted against the categorization regex. Passes deterministically. Builder Q: how do you defend against an LLM inventing features your product doesn't have? Regex denylist feels brittle, but I haven't found a better belt-and-suspenders pattern yet. 🔗 scholar.0xpi.com
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to rate this product!
Comments (1)
Ensure it's well-protected to avoid cheating! :)