MatterOfStocks

MatterOfStocks

Research that shows its track record, not just its opinion.

M
@matterofstocks
Published on Oct 9, 2026
Visit site
1 PeerPush
🔥
Awarded
Trending Now
PeerPush

Details

Pricing
Free

Discovery signals

How AI and people discover MatterOfStocks on PeerPush

AI-readyAI-readyWhether this product carries the structured data - use cases, audiences, platforms - that lets AI match it to the right questions.
Structured

Described for AI to match

Described for AI with use cases, audiences, platforms and pricing so assistants can match it to the right questions.
Discoverable nowDiscoverable nowWhether this product is queryable through the PeerPush API and MCP right now.
Live

Via the PeerPush API and MCP

Queryable through the PeerPush API, MCP and semantic search from day one.

About MatterOfStocks

Most stock research asks you to trust it. MatterOfStocks publishes its track record instead. The platform scores US stocks every night from SEC filings and market data, using published rules rather than opinions. Then it does the part almost nobody does: it grades every one of those calls against what the market actually did next, keeps the result permanently, and shows you the misses alongside the hits. Three commitments, enforced in code rather than in copy Computed, not narrated. AI writes the prose. It never writes a number. Every figure comes from published rules applied to primary sources, and AI text that contradicts the underlying math is automatically replaced before you see it. The narration is there to explain the arithmetic, never to produce it. Backtested, failures included. The whole methodology was replayed across twelve years of history before launch, and the negative results are published. Signals that did not work are listed next to the ones that did. A research product that only shows its wins is a marketing product. Graded against reality. Every call is timestamped and append-only. History is never edited after the fact. Buy-call performance is measured over the five trading days that follow each signal, against real historical prices, and market-adjusted so a call is not credited for a rising tide. What you get Company scoring built from SEC filings, covering fundamentals, forensic accounting checks, and valuation. Congressional trading disclosures, currently 11,197 filings and growing, so you can see which stocks lawmakers have been buying and when they disclosed it. Corporate insider activity from actual filings, filtered to open-market buys and sells, because grants and tax withholding are not decisions. Institutional ownership from actual filings. Written research reports that walk through the numbers in plain language, aimed at someone who wants to understand a company rather than be told what to do about it. Coverage, and its honest limits 3,795 stocks, representing 99.3% of US market value. There is a floor at roughly $300M market cap, and it is deliberate. Below that, filings thin out and data quality drops, and the platform does not score what it cannot stand behind. Coverage gaps are stated on the methodology page rather than papered over. What it deliberately is not It is not a brokerage and has no trading features. It does not tell you what to buy. There are no price targets pulled from thin air, no signals without a published rule behind them, and no claim that a disclosure predicted a move. When the data cannot support a statement, the statement is not made. Getting started Free to start, with a seven day trial of the paid tiers. Pro and Premium add deeper analysis and the full disclosure history. No card required to look around.

Screenshots

Screenshot 1 of MatterOfStocks
Screenshot 2 of MatterOfStocks
Screenshot 3 of MatterOfStocks
Screenshot 4 of MatterOfStocks
Screenshot 5 of MatterOfStocks

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to rate this product!

Comments (1)

F
@fermentory

Publishing the misses next to the hits is rare. Curious about the 5-day grading window though: for scores built on SEC fundamentals, wouldn’t a 3 or 6 month window show more? Or is 5 days the hardest test on purpose?

M
@matterofstocks

@fermentory Thanks. Five days is the shortest window we grade, not the only one, and you're right that it's a harsh test for scores built on SEC filings.

M
@matterofstocks

@fermentory Every call is also graded at 21 and 63 trading days, and our 2012 to 2026 replay looks a full year out.

M
@matterofstocks

@fermentory Over a year the valuation signal does carry information: stocks we marked undervalued beat the sample by 4.7 points, and overvalued ones trailed it by 2.7.

M
@matterofstocks

@fermentory but the overall quality score doesn't predict returns, and the methodology page says so plainly. Full numbers: matterofstocks.com/methodology

F
@fermentory

@matterofstocks Thanks for the full answer. Saying plainly that the quality score doesn't predict returns is the most convincing thing on your page. Respect for publishing that.