App Imp
Discover app ideas through ranked App Store complaints
Details
- Follow on
- @MihkelSylla
- Target Audience
- FoundersMarketersProduct Managers
- Pricing
- Freemium from $9
- Platforms
- Web
Discovery signals
How AI and people discover App Imp on PeerPush
- Perplexity
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- +5 other AI crawlers
Reads by these AI engines
Crawlers behind these engines read this listing on PeerPush.About App Imp
App Imp surfaces frequency-ranked complaints from over 2 million App Store reviews across top categories. By analyzing what users specifically dislike about existing apps, the tool helps you identify market gaps and product opportunities based on real user feedback rather than guesswork. What you get: A free report on any app category. Type "calorie tracking", get every complaint in that market ranked by how often it actually appears. No signup, no card. The Deep Report — €9, one-off, no subscription. The gap counted against the baseline rate across the whole corpus, the named sub-pattern underneath it ("barcode scanner moved behind the paywall — 112 reviews, 9 of 10 apps"), verbatim quotes, who's leaving it open, what the incumbents charge, and what to ship first. What makes us different: Frequency, not vibes. Everyone can read one-star reviews. We count all of them and rank what repeats — the gap nobody has fixed is the one that shows up 112 times, not the one that's loudest. Every complaint is measured against a norm. A complaint running 2.6× the cross-app rate is a real opening. The same complaint at 1.0× is just what apps are. Without that baseline, every category looks broken. Real arithmetic over public reviews, verbatim quotes. Nothing generated, nothing paraphrased. If the number is 112, you can go count it. Who it's for: Indie devs and solo founders deciding what to build next, who'd rather spend €9 than three months finding out. Bootstrappers entering a crowded category who need to know what fourteen incumbents still haven't fixed. Product people sizing up a market they haven't shipped into before. Anyone with a shortlist of ideas and no counted reason to pick one.
Product Video
Watch a video demo of App Imp.
Screenshots
Product Updates (3)
Week #3 update
New Trending, weekly — the rising Google searches, with how many people search each one a month. Click any one and we count that market for you. Count any market yourself — type a phrase, get it counted from real App Store reviews, published or not. What moved — the six markets that changed most in four weeks, on the landing page. What they'd pay — willingness-to-pay counted from reviews, with the figures people named. Better Every counted market now shows in the ideas list; 43 of 72 used to be invisible. Everything is written to be understood in one read. A locked tab tells you what's behind it and what it costs, instead of just stopping you.
Comments (1)
Now it's a library you can browse
Every app, counted – 486 apps (over 10k~ coming soon), each showing the one complaint it runs furthest above the App Store's typical rate, with the share and the denominator behind it. Filter by category, complaint, incumbent size or price. Ranked ideas – 33 app markets ordered by counted gaps and an Opportunity score that breaks into named factors, so you can pick a market before you pick a feature. Your app not in our database? Paste any App Store app and it gets counted. So far 2.1M App Store reviews counted.
Comments (1)
Week #1 updates
Search got much faster: Previously every search regenerated from scratch - median ~14s. Now already-counted categories return instantly. Against 90 days of real searches, 61% resolve with no wait at all. More free reports, browsable without searching: 51 counted category reports, plus /leaderboard — 24 markets ranked by counted gaps, showing which complaints recur across every app in a market. Free, no signup. Get intel when a market gap closes: Each report now ends with a one-field form. If the top complaint stops topping the list -someone shipped a fix, you get the recount. Sent by hand, not a newsletter.
Comments (1)
Reviews (3)
Average 4.7 out of 5
Based on 3 reviews
Worth using before spending 3 months in developing wrong features
Brilliant idea. I really like the approach of looking for opportunities through frequency-ranked user complaints rather than starting with keywords or trying to guess what the market needs. The baseline comparison is especially clever — distinguishing between problems that are simply common to all apps and problems that are unusually frequent in a specific category makes the data much more actionable. A genuinely fresh way to approach product discovery and validation.
Comments (3)
great idea. looks solid. I especially love your brand identity with all those product images. Can you tell me how you created those?
@profuturestrading Thank you! These are all imported through App Store API and stored into my database. Also its constantly updating via database when new visuals show up.
@mihkelsylla And which software did you use for creating those SaaS Info Videos?
Ranking complaints from 2M+ App Store reviews against a cross-app baseline is stronger than collecting loud one-star examples. Can reports segment frequency by country, app version and time window so legacy complaints do not dominate?
@russlan Ill split into multiple since it wont fit into one. Time: yes. Reports cap the sample at 24 months, and 52% of the 2M reviews are under a year old.
@russlan Version: captured on ~100% of reviews, but reports don't segment by it yet. Fair hit, and it's the cheap one to fix.
@russlan Country: no. The corpus is US-only currently in MVP1. Apple scopes reviews per storefront, so that's a re-ingest, not a filter.
Super excited to finally share it – would love your honest feedback and suggestions!
@sundayorisajuyigbes Thank you ;) Not currently but thanks for the offer!