
AtlasEngine
Review commits and PRs before they reach main
Details
- Follow on
- Categories
- Developer Tools
- Target Audience
- Software DevelopersAI-Native EngineersDevOps Engineers
- Pricing
- Free
Discovery signals
How AI and people discover AtlasEngine on PeerPush
About AtlasEngine
I built Atlas (atlasengine.dev): a local-first AI code reviewer that works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Opencode via an MCP server. I've been a hands-on CTO in game dev for the past 17 years. Over the last year I've watched the shift from devs writing a few hundred lines a day to agents shipping entire features in an hour. PR-stage reviewers like CodeRabbit catch surface issues, but they miss architectural drift, small decisions that compound across commits. IMO the PR is too late a stage for review. So I built Atlas for myself: automated review on every branch, plus a UI to quickly walk through changes when something looks off. How it works: * Plugs into your coding agent via MCP * Reviews each branch (or PR) locally, code never leaves your machine * Surfaces findings continuously, not just at PR time Demo (1.5 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J7O556jBW4 It's free to use and runs on top of your existing AI subscription. I've been dogfooding it for 2-3 months. I'd genuinely value feedback on: * Are the findings useful, or just noise? * Does branch-level review actually change how you self-review? * What would block you from putting this in your workflow? Happy to answer anything in the comments.
Screenshots
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to rate this product!




Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!